BUILDING INTELLIGENCE IN THE LEARNING PROCESS IN HIGHER EDUCATION: PHILOSOPHICAL, THEORETICAL, PRACTICAL PARADIGM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58432/tq49jn08Keywords:
intelligence, learning process, students, higher education, holistic learningAbstract
The development of student intelligence in higher education often faces challenges because the education system consistently prioritizes cognitive aspects while neglecting other dimensions, such as emotional, social, and creative components. This situation raises the question of how pedagogical strategies can enhance students' intellectual diversity, thereby making the learning process more comprehensive. This study aims to examine students' views on the development of intelligence during the learning process in higher education while providing insights into effective and adaptive learning practices. The method used is a literature review by reviewing scientific articles, research reports, and selected academic literature published between 2013 and 2023. The analysis used a content analysis approach through the stages of synthesis, classification, and data reduction. The results of the study indicate that although learning in higher education is still dominated by a cognitive orientation, emotional, social, and intrapersonal intelligence have been shown to play a significant role in supporting students' academic and personal success. The ideas of Gardner, Vygotsky, and Goleman emphasize the importance of holistic learning that integrates social interaction, emotional regulation, creativity, and ethical and spiritual dimensions. The contribution of this article lies in its efforts to integrate the theories of multiple intelligences, emotional intelligence, and constructivism into a practical framework for developing holistic learning in higher education, as well as providing concrete recommendations for lecturers to expand assessment and learning strategies beyond cognitive biases.
Downloads
References
Erdem, C. (2024). A comparative meta-analysis of the effects of problem-based learning model on K-12 students’ cognitive outputs. Educational Studies, 50(6), 1498–1519. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2022.2103650
Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic books.
Hersing, W. S. (2017). Managing cognitive bias in safety decision making: Application of emotional intelligence competencies. Journal of Space Safety Engineering, 4(3–4), 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsse.2017.10.001
Mayer, R. E. (2017). Using multimedia for e‐learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 403–423.
Neubauer, A. C., & Freudenthaler, H. H. (2005). Models of emotional intelligence. Emotional Intelligence: An International Handbook, 2005, 31–50.
Patipatpakdee, N., Muangyai Reilly, S., Noipann, P., & Koedkham, J. (2023). A Comparison of the Effectiveness between Multiple-Choice and Essay Writing Exams in Writing Competency Assessment. Journal of Arts and Thai Studies , 45(3 SE-Research Articles), E2510 (1-13). https://so08.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/artssu/article/view/2510
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Lessons for Guidelines from the Diffusion of Innovations. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 21(7), 324–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1070-3241(16)30155-9
Sudjana, N. (2021). Dasar dasar proses belajar mengajar. Sinar Baru Algensindo.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
Zed, M. (2008). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Setia Budi, Zelhendri Zen, Jasrial, Rara Ajeng Pratiwi (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


