ACADEMIC SUPERVISION WITH COACHING TECHNIQUES TO IMPROVE TEACHER PERFORMANCE (MULTI-SITE STUDY AT RANGGEH AND GAYAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, GONDANGWETAN DISTRICT, PASURUAN REGENCY)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58432/13f5pc36Keywords:
Academic Supervision, Coaching Techniques, Teacher Performance, TIRTA Model, Multi-site StudyAbstract
This research is motivated by the real challenges faced by primary school teachers, such as low teaching motivation, the use of monotonous learning methods, and limited mastery of information technology. Furthermore, the implementation of conventional academic supervision often fails to provide a significant impact due to a lack of effective follow-up in encouraging independent professional development. This study aims to describe and analyze the implementation stages of coaching techniques in academic supervision, identify implementation challenges, and evaluate its impact on teacher performance at SDN Ranggeh and SDN Gayam, Gondangwetan District, Pasuruan Regency. The research method employed is a qualitative approach with a multi-site study design. Primary data were collected through in-depth interviews with key informants consisting of principals, school supervisors, as well as senior and junior teachers. Additionally, secondary data were obtained through observation and documentation related to the planning and results of academic supervision. Data analysis was conducted systematically through the processes of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing to ensure the validity of the findings. The expected result of this research is the realization of a collaborative coaching-based academic supervision model using the TIRTA (Goal, Identification, Action Plan, Responsibility) and GROW (Goal, Reality, Options, Will) models. The implementation of this approach is expected to enhance teachers' pedagogical and professional competencies, foster internal motivation, and encourage learning innovations that directly impact the improvement of educational quality and student character in schools.
Downloads
References
Albano, M., & Quinito, J. (2025). The efficacy of GROW model coaching in teacher professional development. International Journal of Educational Leadership, 12(1), 45–58.
Bantali, A., et al. (2025). Netralitas dan objektivitas dalam penelitian kualitatif pendidikan. Jurnal Metodologi Penelitian, 10(2), 112–125.
Burhan, M., & Sauri, S. (2025). Komunikasi empatik kepala sekolah dalam pendampingan guru. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 14(1), 30–42.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publications.
Hijjatin, N., et al. (2025). Peran peneliti sebagai instrumen utama dalam studi multi situs. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Kualitatif, 8(3), 201–215.
Husni, M., et al. (2025). Triangulasi data dalam memverifikasi hasil supervisi akademik. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 11(1), 88–102.
Kemdikbudristek. (2022). Modul Pelatihan Guru Penggerak: Coaching untuk Supervisi Akademik. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan.
Lara, M., et al. (2025). Responsiveness of academic supervision in local contexts: A Pasuruan case study. Journal of Education and Culture, 7(4), 312–326.
Lestari, A. (2023). Pengaruh Coaching Model TIRTA terhadap Kinerja Guru di Sekolah Dasar. Algebra: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Sains, 3(2), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/algebra.v3i2.xxxx
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage Publications.
Mulyasa, E. (2022). Manajemen Kepala Sekolah dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka. Bandung: Bumi Aksara.
Sahertian, P. A. (2008). Konsep Dasar dan Teknik Supervisi Pendidikan: Dalam Rangka Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Sari, P., et al. (2025). Analisis induktif dalam penelitian studi multi situs. Jurnal Analisis Pendidikan, 9(2), 150–165.
Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday.
Smith, R., & Johnson, L. (2015). Communication in supervisory relationships. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(2), 215–230.
Soro, R., Wijaya, L., & Darmawan, A. (2024). Implementasi supervisi akademik berbasis coaching oleh kepala sekolah dalam meningkatkan kompetensi pedagogik guru SDN Cicalengka 06. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 9(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jpd.v9i1.xxxx
Sudjana, N. (2011). Supervisi Akademik. Bandung: Rosda.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
Usman, M. U. (2001). Menjadi Guru Profesional. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Vu, T., et al. (2025). Innovative approaches in academic supervision for primary schools. Global Education Review, 15(2), 120–135.
Whitmore, J. (2019). Coaching for Performance: The Principles and Practice of Coaching and Leadership. Boston: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
Wijaya, H. (2024). Implementasi Supervisi Akademik dalam Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan. Algebra: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Sains, 4(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/algebra.v4i1.xxxx
Yusuf, M., et al. (2025). Tantangan motivasi mengajar guru di era digital. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran, 13(1), 55–67.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ismawati, Taufiq Harris, Suyitno (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


